International Facility Management Association (Hong Kong Chapter)
     
Home
Events
HKIFMA Blog
Education
Conference
Membership
Corporate Sponsorship
Credentials
FM Articles
Career Opportunity
IFMA - Members Only
Links
Chapter Bylaws
About IFMA
Contact Us
Terms of Use
 
     
  FM Essentials  
     
 
Facility Management in China: An Emerging Market
 

Abstract

This paper reviews the growth and development of Facility Management in China. By adopting an observational approach the paper identifies core levels of service provision offered within the China facility management market, i.e., single services, packaged services, management contracting, managing agents through and total facility management contracts. The paper concludes by reflecting on those factors likely to influence the growth and opportunity of facility management within mainland China.

Key words: Facility Management, Hong Kong, China

Introduction

The Peoples Republic of China (PRC) is geographically the world’s third largest country and the largest by population. China’s population in 2004 was 1,298 million. By the year 2010 the population is forecast to be 1,371 million. Approximately 25% of the population is aged 14 or younger; 68% are between 15 and 65; and 7% are 65 or older. China is currently changing from a command economy to a market-based one and from a rural (60%), agricultural society to an industrial, urban (40%) one. At the moment China is the fastest growing economy in the world. Official statistics indicate that per capita GDP grew by approximately 8 per cent a year (in real terms) for the last twenty-five years. However, GDP growth tends to be higher along China’s eastern coast, in the south and within China’s Special Economic Zones. For example, GDP growth in 2002 in Beijing was 10%; Shanghai 11%; Xian 13%; Shenzen; 15%; and Dongguan 18%, (DTZ, 2003).

The World Bank reported that China’s economic growth has been driven by four factors (World Bank, 1997):

  • A high savings rate, which has supported vigorous rates of investment and capital accumulation.
  • Structural change, which has been both a cause and an effect for growth, e.g. the shift in agriculture’s share of GDP from 71 per cent in 1978 to about 50 per cent in 1995. [Agriculture’s share of GDP had dropped to 15% by 2002.]
  • Pragmatic and incremental reforms resulting in a move from a planned economy in 1978 to post-1993 a “socialist market economy with Chinese characteristics”.
  • Economic conditions, e.g. the “advantages of backwardness” whereby poor countries grow more quickly than rich ones.

China’s joining the World Trade Organization (WTO) in 2001 also helped to speed up the alignment of China's domestic market with the international market. This is evidenced in a recent Chinese government report stating that foreign direct investment (FDI) reached record levels in search of lower labor and production costs as well as access to the world’s largest single domestic market. In 2004, China attracted FDI of more than US$60.6 billion, up 13 per cent from the previous year. The big push to set up operations in China is prompted by a number of factors, including – low wages, large talent pool, large domestic demand, proximity to manufacturing, ties to the rest of Asia, good (and improving) infrastructure, Government incentives and breaking down of trade barriers. Industries are also moving to China in large numbers driven by internal consumer demand. Research on 225 companies that have recently set up in China shows that telecom is the number one industry (19% of all firms), followed by electronics (12%), hardware peripherals and software (10%) and business process outsourcing (9%), White 2005.

FM in China

Given the pace of development in China and the amount of direct foreign investment how significant is Facility Management (FM) in China? Anecdotal evidence would indicate that China currently lags behind Europe and the USA both in impact and import. For example, in China the term Facility Management, when translated into Chinese - ???? - typically includes the characters for Property Management. Hence, the two terms are frequently used as synonyms. Property management in China has traditionally related to the timely collection of rents and an ability to minimize tenant complaints. Service provision has been normally restricted to the common areas of a building - lift lobbies and vestibules, the building fabric as well as common services such as HVACR, cleaning and security. The management of the tenant space rarely occurs, and the idea of managing the property for the benefit of tenants is consequently lacking. This attitude leads building owners to be unwilling to invest in new services and equipment that they perceive as only benefiting the tenant. However, this historical view is slowly changing. For example, recently a number of Hong Kong based facility management firms have successfully set up joint venture teams to provide FM services in China. Focusing mainly on foreign investments, these companies offer a comprehensive range of services, Table 1.

Table 1: Comprehensive range of Facility Management services offered in China

Defects liability management Space management & utilization
Project management for interior alteration and renovation Building maintenance (preventative & corrective)
Clean room management 24 x 7 hekp desk
Contract management services for E&M equipment Janitorial & cleaning services
Landscaping & gardening services Reception service
Risk management Mailroom management
Financial management  

Most Hong Kong facility management companies operating in China work in a limited number of China’s major cities, e.g. Beijing, Shanghai, Guangzhou and Shenzen. However, at least one firm has developed a wide network of clients and geographical spread, Figure 1, targeting China’s second tier cities. The company currently manages over 300 properties under management in 46 cities, covering 250 million square feet with turnover in excess of RMB40m (~US$5m), (Fong, 2003).


Figure 1: China Coverage for DTZ

FM companies operating in China recognize that a demanding global business community not only wants but also needs the kind of customer service provision found in the West. For without this, owners run the risk of losing tenants in an ever growing competitive market place, and tenants risk losing business if the daily functioning of their office and commercial space does not match demands for a more effective (and responsive) workplace. These are not always forthcoming although the top end of the market is responsive to customer needs. Nevertheless, the adoption of a more mature facility management perspective among China’s emerging property managers bodes well for the future. Recent evidence would also indicate that major Chinese companies demand similar facility management services to their international counterparts.

One experienced facility management professional recently stated that service teams in China tend to be manned by younger and more energetic staff when compared to Hong Kong. They also tended to lack experience and knowledge of international standards. This is a problem where little training material has, to date, been translated into Chinese. International companies and Chinese firms that aspire to be recognized as international leaders, however demand quality services and these tend to be provided, initially at least, by non-local vendors working in partnership with joint venture property managers. Unfortunately, short contract terms - typically two to three years – has encouraged some clients / property owners to exclude the Hong Kong based FM contractor at contract renewal, awarding on the second contract the work to the joint venture partner.

Facility Management in Hong Kong

The development of facility management in Mainland China may be contrasted with that of Hong Kong where many experienced FM professionals now work within the city. For example, the local Chapter of the International Facility Management Association (IFMA) has ~200 members, the largest Chapter membership outside of North America. Approximately 25% of the Hong Kong IFMA Chapter members are designated as “Certified Facility Managers”, the highest proportion of all IFMA Chapters. The Hong Kong Institute of Facilities Managers (HKIFM) has over 300 members and BIFM 30 plus.

The practice of FM in Hong Kong is beginning to emerge from a culture of contracting out (outsourcing) work packages / individual service providers to one of bundling inter-related components. These are:

  • Maintenance m&e / fabric
  • Cleaning
  • Gardening / landscape
  • Catering
  • Security
  • Reception / secretarial services

Hong Kong’s FM market is less mature when compared to either the UK or North America. It also retains a property management bias. For example, the Chinese name for Eastpoint - one of Hong Kong’s major FM companies - is Ji Bon. This translates as “setting up / managing property”. However, the FM market is maturing, with a significant number of managing agent contracts currently in operation as well as a small number of Total FM contracts.

FM companies operating in Hong Kong may be classified, Figure 2:

  • Single Services: Those companies concerned with single service contracting, concentrate on the delivery of one particular service type such as cleaning, building maintenance or lifts for example.

  • Packaged Services: When companies draw together a variety of types of service to provide a range of service delivery this is called a packaged service, or multiple services. For example, a security company may offer manned guarding, burglar alarm maintenance and electronic entry systems.

  • Management Contracting: Management contracting companies will provide a balance of both delivery and management and tend to focus on a small number of service types. In these cases, client organizations tend to deal with a number of management contractors and retain overall managerial control.

  • Managing Agents: Management Agents provide a management-only service for their clients. Where a management agent is appointed by a client, they tend to contract directly with those companies delivering facilities.

  • Total Facilities Management: Total Facilities Management (TFM) companies manage and deliver a wide range of services either directly or by sub-contract. They offer their clients a comprehensive service with their primary emphasis being their management ability. In such cases the client relinquishes the hands-on management of facilities.

  • Infrastructure FM: Infrastructure FM companies are a relatively recent development in the FM marketplace. Such companies are prepared to offer a ‘one-stop-shop’ for all client needs, including non- core service areas such as finance, human resources, project management and property management in addition to more traditional FM support services.



  • Figure 2: Categories of Facilities Management Company

Hong Kong’s facility management industry has emerged quickly during the last five years with an estimated US$5 billion turnover, (SMCP, 2003). A recent study by the HKIFM (2003) estimated that the residential sector to be worth 50% of the market, followed by commercial properties accounting for 21% and offices at 16%. That the residential sector should dominate the current market is perhaps a reflection of its immaturity, where the sector is dominated by traditional property management issues. It is also linked to the Hong Kong Government’s drive to outsource public sector housing estate management. The Hong Kong Housing Authority (HA) has typically built in excess of 50,000 flats / apartments per annum. These are either let or sold to the public. To date the HA has built and manages 651,900 rental housing units and built and sold 399,100 housing units under the Home Ownership Scheme. It has also developed 2.34 million square foot of commercial / factory property and currently owns and manages 100,000 car parking spaces.

Traditionally, the management of HA property was undertaken in house. A policy change in the mid-90s dictated that new estates would be managed by the private sector. Later this was extended, on an incremental basis, to all existing estates. Known as the ‘phased service transfer programme’, an initiative to increase private sector involvement in HA estate and maintenance management, a total of 322,000 housing units have been outsourced (in terms of estate property management) to the private sector by the end of 2003, (HA, 2003). Private sector involvement relates primarily to cleaning, security, rent collection, minor repairs, maintenance and improvements work as well as tenant advisory services. A significant number of contracts have been awarded to either Hong Kong based property management companies or start up firms manned by ex-HA employees. The HA has adopted a two envelop system for contractor selection. This ensures that the technical and service capability of the contractor meets minimum requirements before the tender (bid) figure is appraised. The HA retains an ‘intelligent client’ role to monitor and supervise the contract. Generally the transfer of HA estate management has worked well although the tenant advisory service is frequently cited as being problematic.

Within the commercial sector Hong Kong’s FM industry is dominated by property management functions. For example, it has been estimated that operations and maintenance accounts for ~45% of operational budgets, security 30% and cleaning 20%, (SCMP 2003). The sector also tends to provide facility management services to linked organizations, i.e. the holding group, often a developer, hires internally a property / facility management company from within its own stable of companies. This is not to say that no independent FM companies exist. They do and would appear to be prospering although “contracts are issued on a piecemeal basis, by clients who are unsure of the ability of the market to service requests and who break up potentially viable contracts into unviable localized instructions”, (Eddleston, 2003). Facility management service companies operating in Hong Kong are currently under extreme pressure to cut costs. This has been initially achieved by outsourcing manpower intensive activities such as cleaning and security. Downward pressure on salaries in these two areas has been high, with labour rates dropping by ~50% in the last two to thee years. Smaller FM budgets have also impacted maintenance costs, with specialist sub-contractors also under pressure to reduce their labour rates. Deferred maintenance programmes also tend to be extended although it has been noticeable that some commercial / office owners have seized the opportunity that Hong Kong’s current downturn in the leasing market to increase the level of maintenance and number of renovation projects.

Drivers for Change

Hong Kong’s facility management service sector is changing. Their client’s are now beginning to seek companies that can go beyond single source suppliers, resulting in a bundling of non-core activities. Increasingly, market forces are also taking this business trend further by creating partnership agreements and in some cases strategic alliances. This is particularly evident in the financial services sector where the majority of international banks have completely outsourced their FM functions. Hong Kong companies are also beginning to downsize space and adopt alternative workplace strategies through IT. Developments in software are driving this process as more and more companies apply Computer Maintenance Management Systems (CMMS) in the workplace. These changes may be summarized, (Brookhouse, 2000):

  • CMMS tools will increasingly be adopted by organizations. These help to produce accurate inventories, track direct costs, schedule maintenance and record the daily operation of the premises.

  • Greater awareness of the cost of using space and the adoption of accurate charge back procedures.

  • Changes in workplace practices as we move away from the use of space based on hierarchy to one of need.

  • Adoption of “flexible working” – time flexible, place flexible, location variable - and an increasing acceptance of the blurring between “home” and the “office”. This will impact investment decisions between physical space and cyber space.

  • The move from permanent staff to more contract workers. This is currently driven by employers seeking to minimize their future commitments. Increasingly employees will drive this as they seek out more flexible work opportunities.

  • A reduction in “the cultural affinity to property” as firms recognize that capital appreciation is a poor substitute for direct investment in the firm’s core business.

  • The continuing recognition that “people [are] the ultimate scarce resource”, rather than land. This will influence the way organizations procure, locate, design and manage new buildings.

  • The facility manager will act as the catalyst for change within the organization on issues related to the environment and in particular sustainability.

  • A growing awareness that “cultural identity” influences the practice of FM. This is an important issue as major corporations seek out global partnerships and common work practices.

The practice of facility management continues to evolve and develop in China and Hong Kong. Globally, it is driven by changes in the workplace, by employee / employer relations – from jobs for life to contract employment, by IT with its constant stream of surprises (not all of whom are welcome) and by uncertainty. This last point is crucial. Hitherto many successful organizations based a part of their success on being risk averse, unwilling (or emotionally unable) to take a gamble. Success and continuity came through being predictable, reliable and perhaps dull. Today’s employees, especially those under 35, show less loyalty, emphasize personal freedom and control, demand premium facilities, including IT, and expect flexible work schedules.

References

Brookhouse, S (2000) Managing design after “the death of distance, Facilities, Volume 18, number 3 / 4, pp172.

China Economic Net:
http://en.ce.cn/Business/Macro-economic/200505/12/t20050512_3817950.shtml

Eddleston, S. (2003) FM Outsourcing: The Asian Experience, proceedings of IFMA World Workplace Asia Conference, Yokohama Japan, 2003

Fong, Alice (2003) FM in China: Perspective from Service Provider, graduate lecture to the Hong Kong Polytechnic University

HA (2003), Housing Authority Annual Report 2002/3, http://www.housingauthority.gov.hk/en

HKIFM (2003), http://www.hkifm.org.hk/

White, R (2005) China’s Place in Off-shoring, proceedings of CoreNet Global Asia Summit, March 21 – 23

World Bank (1997) China 2020: Development Challenges in the New Century, The World Bank, September, Washington D.C., pp 1-15.

John D. Gilleard, PhD
The Hong Kong Polytechnic University
email: bejohn@polyu.edu.hk

 
 
 
 
 

Top

Copyright ©2005 International Facility Management Association - Hong Kong Chapter. All Rights Reserved.
 


EC Harris (Hong Kong) Limited
Jones Lang lasalle
Synergis Facility Management Limited


infoComm2010